The Problem Our Work Results FAQ About Projects Book a Call
Instructional Design  ·  Learning Experience Design

Information alone does not change
how learners perform.

Tell us who you are and we will show you what is relevant to your situation.

I am
The situation

Most learning experiences were not designed.
They were assembled.

If any of these resonate, you are in the right place.

01

"Social media and AI have changed how students absorb information. The course has not changed with it."

The same student who cannot focus through a 40-minute lecture will spend three hours going down a YouTube rabbit hole. Attention is not the problem. The design is.

02

"Your course was probably built around the student who reads everything and takes notes. That student is a minority in most cohorts now."

Readers, watchers, and doers are all in the same room. When the path through the material only works for one type, the others quietly fall behind.

03

"You added a tool. Students treated it like optional extra credit."

When the experience lives outside the course, students leave it outside the course. The solution was never another tab.

01

"Employees complete the training. Nothing changes on the floor."

Completion and retention are two different outcomes. When training does not explain why it matters to the specific person taking it, the click-through becomes a ritual rather than a learning experience.

02

"Mandatory training is the room nobody wants to be in. The phone comes out within minutes."

When the material has no face and no consequence, employees process it on autopilot. The quiz gets retaken until the passing score appears. Nothing sticks.

03

"We bought a learning platform. Our L&D team spent more time managing it than designing for it."

External platforms create overhead. Integration issues, licensing negotiations, and adoption friction often consume more resource than the training itself delivers.

Performance data

What changes when the design
is treated as seriously as the content.

Verified outcomes
Average score improvement
38%
Across redesigned programs, measured against the previous version
↑ Consistent across verticals
Licensing cost reduction
68%
When external platforms are replaced with native LMS builds
↑ Zero new vendor contracts
Completion rate lift
Average after a multi-path redesign. From 44% to 82% in one program.
↑ Voluntary re-engagement recorded
New infrastructure required
$0
Everything built inside the platform your institution already runs
↑ No IT security review needed
Before vs. after redesign — program metrics
Completion (before)
44%
Completion (after)
82%
Pass rate (before)
51%
Pass rate (after)
89%
Compliance (before)
58%
Compliance (after)
93%
"

Our six-month post-training retention data was the best we had recorded in four years of running this programme. The content had not changed. The design had.

L&D Director · Financial Services · Post-Redesign Review
What we build

Not a new platform.
A new experience inside yours.

We take what an institution or organization already has and redesign how learners move through it. Built with accessibility in mind, designed to work within your specific standards.

A Tenneri-built course module
yourschool.lms.com / ACCT101 / Week-6
ACCT 101 — Week 6: Debits & Credits
Overview
Activities
Progress
Module progress
60%
🎬
Concept Overview
Short-form summary · For every learner type
✓ Done
📊
Journal Entry Scenario Lab
Simulation · Decision-based · Self-paced
Live
🧩
Debit or Credit? Challenge
Game · Instant reinforcement
Unlocked
📋
Knowledge Check
Scored · Auto-syncs to gradebook
Next
🎬
Concept Overview
3 minutes · Video + text summary
✓ Done

A condensed walkthrough for the learner who absorbs by watching. No prior knowledge assumed.

📊
Journal Entry Scenario Lab
15-20 minutes · Hands-on simulation
Live

Learners work through a real scenario before assessment. Decisions have consequences. Wrong entries show the downstream effect.

🧩
Debit or Credit? Challenge
5 minutes · Game · Repeatable
Unlocked

Reinforcement that does not feel like repetition. Learners replay voluntarily.

📋
Knowledge Check
10 questions · Gradebook sync
Next

Scores sync automatically. No manual entry. Unlocks once the scenario lab is complete.

60% complete
Module progress
2 of 4 activities complete. On track for Friday's deadline.
Concept OverviewDone
Journal Entry Scenario LabIn progress
Debit or Credit? ChallengeUnlocked
Knowledge CheckLocked
Continue: Journal Entry Scenario Lab
Module in motion
Watch in full view
Module Architecture and Course Structure. Tabbed layouts, embedded activities, and interactive content living inside a single course page. No external platforms, no additional logins, no infrastructure.

There is more where that came from

Simulated OS Environment
Cybersecurity · Technical Training
Adaptive Assignments
Assessment · Gradebook Integration
Custom LMS Applications
Training · Phishing Simulation
Games & Gamification
Engagement · Voluntary Completion
Results in the wild

Three different problems.
One consistent outcome.

Learners who finished. Learners who wanted more. Learners who forgot they did not want to be there.

Higher Education · Data Science
38%
Score improvement
after redesign
68%
Licensing cost
reduction

When the redesign outlasted the vendor

A program with strong content but the wrong container. Completion sat at 44%. After a full multi-path redesign, readers had depth, watchers had short-form summaries, and doers had scenario labs that put them inside the material before they were assessed. Scores improved 38% and completion nearly doubled. The institution eliminated its external platform, rebuilt everything in-house, and licensing costs dropped 68%.

"I retook this course after failing the first version. I cannot believe how different it felt. I actually understood what I was doing this time." A learner · Data Science Program · second attempt after redesign
Higher Education · Emerging Technology
Asked for
more
End-of-course
learner response

Making the unintuitive feel inevitable

A quantum computing course built in close collaboration with subject matter experts. Each concept scaffolded against the previous one. Activities designed to create moments of recognition rather than confusion. Difficult ideas introduced through analogy, reinforced through application, tested through scenario. No subject is too complex to teach online. The constraint is almost never the material. It is always the path through it.

"When is the next one? I want to keep going." Multiple learners · end-of-course feedback
Corporate · Mandatory Compliance
<60%
Completion before
redesign
>90%
Completion after
redesign

The room nobody wants to be in

Mandatory GRC and compliance training where employees were completing modules on autopilot. The redesign led with the personal why: what happens to this specific role in this specific scenario if this goes wrong. Scenario-based modules put employees inside real situations, mapped to GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 frameworks. People stopped going through the motions and started paying attention.

"I actually understood why we have these policies. I had been clicking through that training for three years and this is the first time it made sense." An employee · Systems Training Coordinator · Compliance Redesign
Before you reach out

What is the first thing
holding you back?

Select what resonates and we will surface the answer that matters to your situation.

What is your biggest concern about a project like this?

On ownership
You own it completely. Every file delivered in standard web formats your LMS administrator can open, edit, and maintain without us. No proprietary format, no locked system, no ongoing dependency. You are not starting a vendor relationship. You are adding a permanent institutional asset.
On your team's workload
Less than you expect. Subject matter experts provide the knowledge and the learning outcomes. The instructional engineering, the activity design, the sequencing, and the builds are handled on our end. Most engagements require a few focused conversations, not sustained time commitments. Your faculty or L&D team are the source material, not the project managers.
On investment
Projects scale with scope. The 20-minute call exists specifically to scope what makes sense before any figure is discussed. You will know exactly what gets built, what it costs, and what your learners will experience before any commitment is made. No retainers, no surprise add-ons, no ongoing licensing.
On evaluating without committing
The AI Communication module is live and fully interactive. No login, no form, no commitment. You can also read our shareable overview, formatted for forwarding to a dean or an L&D director. Or reach us at ramano@tenneri.com. No pitch, no pressure.
You own it completely. Every file is delivered in standard web formats your LMS administrator can open, edit, and maintain without us. There is no proprietary format, no locked system, no ongoing dependency. A platform update will not break a native build the way it might break an external integration, because the code lives inside your system rather than calling out to ours. You are not starting a vendor relationship. You are adding a permanent asset.
Less than you might expect. Subject matter experts provide the knowledge and the learning outcomes. The instructional engineering, the activity design, the sequencing, and the builds are handled on our end. Most engagements require a few focused conversations rather than sustained time commitments. Your people are the source material, not the project managers.
Projects scale with scope. A single module redesign and a full program build are different conversations with different numbers. The 20-minute call exists specifically to scope what makes sense before any figure is discussed. You will know exactly what gets built, what it costs, and what your learners will experience before any commitment is made. No retainers, no surprise add-ons, no ongoing licensing.
Yes. The AI Communication module is live and fully interactive. No login, no form, no commitment. You can also read our shareable overview, a clean document you can forward to whoever needs to see it. Or send a question directly to ramano@tenneri.com.
Need something to share with a dean or an L&D director? We have you covered.

A clean, readable overview of what we do, our results, and how we work. Opens in a new tab. Print to PDF to forward.

View & Download Overview →
Ramano Stoute, Founder of Tenneri
Ramano Stoute
Founder, Tenneri
The person behind the work

Built out of frustration.
Sharpened into a practice.

I come from a family of educators. My grandfather taught. My mother taught. I taught. Teaching is the inherited assumption of my household. The question was never whether to be in education. It was always what education could look like if someone actually designed it.

I spent years building learning environments for my own students, then for institutions, then for organizations, because what was available was not good enough. Not for the student watching a 40-slide deck at 11pm. Not for the employee clicking through a compliance module on autopilot. Not for the instructor who knew their material cold but had no path to make it land.

So I built the path. Custom environments, scenario labs, adaptive assessments, Compliance training modules mapped to real regulatory frameworks. Everything native, everything owned by the institution. No vendor, no subscription, no dependency.

The moment I realized I had built something others needed was when a program saw its completion rates nearly double and licensing costs drop 68%, not because the content changed, but because the design did. That is when Tenneri stopped being a set of tools I built for myself and became something I could offer to others.

I am not the largest instructional design firm in this market. I am the one who will spend more time thinking about how your learners move through your material than most firms will spend on your entire project. That's just how I work.

Ramano Stoute
Founder, Tenneri  ·  Instructional Designer and eLearning Developer
How it works

Three steps. No guesswork.

What happens after you reach out. Before any proposal, any contract, or any commitment.

Step 01 💬

You tell us what is not working.

A 20-minute conversation. We listen to what your program or organization needs.

Step 02 💡

We show you what is possible.

Inside the system you already have. No new tools, no new infrastructure, no new budget line.

Step 03 🛠️

We scope the first build together.

You will know exactly what gets built, what it costs, and what your learners will experience before anything is agreed.

"

I caught myself checking my privacy settings on the way home. This is the first time the training stayed with me outside of work.

Marketing Associate · Cyber Awareness Programme

Let's make your learners feel the same way.