Tell us who you are and we will show you what is relevant to your situation.
If any of these resonate, you are in the right place.
"Social media and AI have changed how students absorb information. The course has not changed with it."
The same student who cannot focus through a 40-minute lecture will spend three hours going down a YouTube rabbit hole. Attention is not the problem. The design is.
"Your course was probably built around the student who reads everything and takes notes. That student is a minority in most cohorts now."
Readers, watchers, and doers are all in the same room. When the path through the material only works for one type, the others quietly fall behind.
"You added a tool. Students treated it like optional extra credit."
When the experience lives outside the course, students leave it outside the course. The solution was never another tab.
"Employees complete the training. Nothing changes on the floor."
Completion and retention are two different outcomes. When training does not explain why it matters to the specific person taking it, the click-through becomes a ritual rather than a learning experience.
"Mandatory training is the room nobody wants to be in. The phone comes out within minutes."
When the material has no face and no consequence, employees process it on autopilot. The quiz gets retaken until the passing score appears. Nothing sticks.
"We bought a learning platform. Our L&D team spent more time managing it than designing for it."
External platforms create overhead. Integration issues, licensing negotiations, and adoption friction often consume more resource than the training itself delivers.
Our six-month post-training retention data was the best we had recorded in four years of running this programme. The content had not changed. The design had.
L&D Director · Financial Services · Post-Redesign ReviewWe take what an institution or organization already has and redesign how learners move through it. Built with accessibility in mind, designed to work within your specific standards.
There is more where that came from
Learners who finished. Learners who wanted more. Learners who forgot they did not want to be there.
A program with strong content but the wrong container. Completion sat at 44%. After a full multi-path redesign, readers had depth, watchers had short-form summaries, and doers had scenario labs that put them inside the material before they were assessed. Scores improved 38% and completion nearly doubled. The institution eliminated its external platform, rebuilt everything in-house, and licensing costs dropped 68%.
A quantum computing course built in close collaboration with subject matter experts. Each concept scaffolded against the previous one. Activities designed to create moments of recognition rather than confusion. Difficult ideas introduced through analogy, reinforced through application, tested through scenario. No subject is too complex to teach online. The constraint is almost never the material. It is always the path through it.
Mandatory GRC and compliance training where employees were completing modules on autopilot. The redesign led with the personal why: what happens to this specific role in this specific scenario if this goes wrong. Scenario-based modules put employees inside real situations, mapped to GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 frameworks. People stopped going through the motions and started paying attention.
Select what resonates and we will surface the answer that matters to your situation.
What is your biggest concern about a project like this?
A clean, readable overview of what we do, our results, and how we work. Opens in a new tab. Print to PDF to forward.
I come from a family of educators. My grandfather taught. My mother taught. I taught. Teaching is the inherited assumption of my household. The question was never whether to be in education. It was always what education could look like if someone actually designed it.
I spent years building learning environments for my own students, then for institutions, then for organizations, because what was available was not good enough. Not for the student watching a 40-slide deck at 11pm. Not for the employee clicking through a compliance module on autopilot. Not for the instructor who knew their material cold but had no path to make it land.
So I built the path. Custom environments, scenario labs, adaptive assessments, Compliance training modules mapped to real regulatory frameworks. Everything native, everything owned by the institution. No vendor, no subscription, no dependency.
The moment I realized I had built something others needed was when a program saw its completion rates nearly double and licensing costs drop 68%, not because the content changed, but because the design did. That is when Tenneri stopped being a set of tools I built for myself and became something I could offer to others.
I am not the largest instructional design firm in this market. I am the one who will spend more time thinking about how your learners move through your material than most firms will spend on your entire project. That's just how I work.
What happens after you reach out. Before any proposal, any contract, or any commitment.
A 20-minute conversation. We listen to what your program or organization needs.
Inside the system you already have. No new tools, no new infrastructure, no new budget line.
You will know exactly what gets built, what it costs, and what your learners will experience before anything is agreed.
I caught myself checking my privacy settings on the way home. This is the first time the training stayed with me outside of work.
Marketing Associate · Cyber Awareness Programme